Saturday, April 19, 2008

Acknowledgements - Jim Meehan


Jim Meehan and his wife Marsha joined the Wethersfield Historical Society in 2006 after retiring from careers in Information Technology at The Travelers.

His interest in Thomas Hickey began with a casual conversation at an Elderhostel program and grew into a several month, part-time, investigative effort - the first real historical reading or research that Jim has done since college in the 1960's.

In addition to the historical society Jim is a member of the Men's Garden Club of Wethersfield where he edits the newsletter and writes a monthly column; The Wethersfield Beautification Trust where he moves dirt and pulls weeds; and (with Marsha) of WWUH - "Public Alternative Radio from the University of Hartford, 91.3 FM and wwuh.org" as members of the classical music staff.

He also writes essays for his Internet blog www.compostablematter.com.

Go to Thomas Hickey Table of Contents
Go to Wethersfield Historical Society Home Page

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Thomas Hickey - Table of Contents

Return to Wethersfield Historical Society Member's Articles Table of Contents

Return to the Wethersfield Historical Society Home Page

The "Member Articles" section of this website includes research and writing of Wethersfield Historical Society members representative of their interest and enthusiasm for topics related to Wethersfield history and culture. Member Articles are not edited by Wethersfield Historical Society staff and while we hope you find the contributions to "Member Articles" interesting and informative, they do not reflect the research, scholarly editing, views, or opinions of Wethersfield Historical Society's staff, Governing Board or general membership as a whole

Please click on the chapter name to go directly to that chapter.

Chapter 1 - "Do You Know About Thomas Hickey?"
Chapter 2 - History Detecting
Chapter 3 - Putting On The White Gloves
Chapter 4 - An Earlier Inquiry
Chapter 5 - "Turncoats, Traitors and Heroes"
Chapter 6 - Knowlton's Rangers
Chapter 7 - Washington's Guard
Chapter 8 - Hearsay Evidence
Chapter 9 - Interpreting The Evidence
Chapter 10 - Divertimento
Chapter 11 - "American Archives"
Chapter 12 - So What's The Real Story?
Chapter 13 - Postscript & Bibliography
Acknowledgements - Jim Meehan

Monday, March 31, 2008

Chapter 1 – “Do You Know About Thomas Hickey?”

"I noticed that you're from Wethersfield, Connecticut."

I was standing, empty-plate-in-hand, in the breakfast buffet line at an Elderhostel Golf program and the person talking to me was Sol Henner, a self-described retired Revolutionary War historian. He continued, "Do you know about Thomas Hickey?"

I ran quickly through my mental Rolodex of friends, acquaintances, and names I might have heard - but I came up empty. "No, I don't think I do."

"Well he was a well known Revolutionary War traitor who lived for a short while in your town."

"Well I guess then that we wouldn't have any streets named after him, would we?"

"No, I would think not. He was a member of George Washington's Guard and took part in a plot to kidnap him." Later that week he gave me a piece of paper with the words Traitors, Turncoats and Heroes by John Bakeless written on it. "You might find it interesting."

Well, we do belong to the Wethersfield Historical Society. So I'll probably check it out there when we get back home."


Go to Next Chapter
Go to Thomas Hickey Table of Contents
Go to Wethersfield Historical Society Home Page

Chapter 2 - History Detecting

But before I went to the society, I thought I would search the World Wide Web and see what I could find there about Thomas Hickey. I had recently read a review of Public Television's History Detectives program that questioned why the investigators needed to travel any further than their personal computers in order to research the events they were checking up on. And I wondered the same thing myself.



I Googled "Thomas Hickey traitor" and was provided with a list of several websites and books, including the Bakeless one, that talked about the subject. I would return to Google several more times during my research to refine or expand the booklist, and in the process discover Google Books which allows the viewer to electronically search through and even see actual portions of a book online.

But at that moment I was more excited about reading "The Plot to Kidnap Washington" on the Internet in Newsday.com's New York History section.

"A miserably bungled plot to kidnap George Washington and assassinate his chief officers led to the hanging of one of his special guards, the jailing of the mayor of New York, and a stepped-up search for Loyalists on Long Island."

Among these "Loyalists" (American colonists who supported the British) were William Tryon the Governor of New York, and former Governor of North Carolina, and New York Mayor David Matthews.


(William Tryon)

"A weak link in the plot, however, was one of Washington's trusted Life Guard...Thomas Hickey, who has been described as 'a dark-complexioned man of five feet six, well set...an Irishman and hitherto a deserter from the British Army.' Hickey was himself jailed by American authorities for attempting to pass counterfeit notes, and he unwisely talked of the plot with a cellmate, another counterfeiter named Isaac Ketcham, who was from Cold Spring Harbor. "Ketchum, seeing an opportunity to be set free, squealed on Hickey. The ex-guard was court-martialed and found guilty of mutiny and sedition. On orders of Washington, and with 20,000 Continental soldiers as spectators, Hickey was hanged on June 28 in a field near Bowery Lane. ('We are hanging them as fast as we find them out,' a correspondent wrote to a friend in Boston.) Although other Life Guard members were also implicated, Hickey was the only one of the plotters to be executed."

This was even easier than I thought it would be. Now I figured I would just Google "Thomas Hickey Wethersfield" and find out when he lived in town and where. Then I'd have the whole story.

Nothing! Well Google actually never gives you "nothing". It tries its best, but sometimes what it comes up with is not exactly what you might be looking for. For example here is some of what my "Wethersfield Thomas Hickey" query generated.

"Design Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes - May 18, 2005 ESS queried whether there were any issues to be concerned with regarding the Wethersfield Historic District. Joe Hickey responded that while the site is not... "2003 Salem 3 Mile Road Race ...12, Colchester, CT 23:26.6 7:49 154 86 19 Izard, Thomas, 48, Wethersfield, ... Norwich, CT 26:25.6 8:49 318 144 31 Thomas Hickey, 46, South Windsor, ... "Manchester Road Race - Timing ... AVERY JONATHAN GRANBY CT06035 AYRES JR THOMAS WETHERSFIELD CT06109 AYSON ... ALICE PARKERSBURG WV26104 HERNANDEZ LOUIS HICKEY CHRISTOPHER MANCHESTER ..."

I tried various other combinations of searches such as "Wethersfield Revolutionary War" which seemed to bring back a list of pretty much every Internet article concerning that conflict; and "Wethersfield Traitors" which pointed me to Silas Deane after whom our village's main road is named and whose treasonous activities are, from my parochial small town perspective, at best dubious - he was exonerated after all! In frustration I input "Wethersfield 1760" and was directed to "Wethersfield, CT Vital Records 1634 – 1868 - From the Barbour Collection as found at the CT State Library". There were no "Hickeys" listed.

I was at a digital dead end. So I ordered the book that Sol Henner had recommended through interlibrary loan and went to The Wethersfield Historical Society to do some old fashioned brick-and-mortar research.

Go to Next Chapter
Go to Thomas Hickey Table of Contents
Go to Wethersfield Historical Society Home Page

Chapter 3 - Putting On the White Gloves

"We’ll have to put on the white gloves for this one." said Assistant Director Melissa Josefiak.

Melissa had looked through the usually productive sources on census, property ownership, and births with no success. Now she was going through an index of material in the vault and found an indication that something about Thomas Hickey was contained in the financial accounts of Samuel Hanmer, a local merchant. She went into the secured storage room and came out with an original document that was created in a time when the Internet was comprised of the Olde Towne Crier and the closest thing to "Google" was what some people mistakenly called the gang of geese that many families raised on their property.

The cover was leather - aged and stained by several years of day-to-day usage followed by a few centuries of family passing down and utilization as an historical resource. The paper was brown, brittle and terrifying to touch. And the handwriting, ornate and studied in the style of the time, was difficult to decipher - sometimes due to its faintness but mostly because the shapes of the letters which, while presumably of the same alphabet, nonetheless were unfamiliar to my modern eye.

"Writing in colonial America was also a predominantly male skill, tied strongly to occupation and class. Lawyers and their clerks, scholars, physicians, clergy, and business people needed to be able to write

"Different hands were considered proper and appropriate according to style, class, gender, and occupation. For example, 18th century females used the Italianate hand, which was considered easier to learn and more feminine in appearance. Men in commerce were expected to use a hand that inspired confidence and demonstrated self-assurance." (http://dohistory.org/on_your_own/toolkit/writing.html)

Using a pile of white computer paper, Melissa constructed a prop onto which the book could be opened, and instructed me to lightly grasp each page at the upper right hand corner and turn gently. The first two sheets were a chronological index of customers with accompanying page numbers pointing to their accounts. We both made several passes over the list of names before I spotted something that looked like it said "Thomas Hickey". Melissa affirmed my interpretation and I leafed excitedly, but slowly, up to page fifty-three where, after several uncomprehending visual trips up and down the page, I found:

"February 25 1775
Then settled all just accounts with Mister Thomas Hickey as written our hand
Thomas Hickey
Samuel Hanmer"

I began tracing backwards, slowly turning each page from the its mattress of modern vellum to an uneven placement on its aging original bed, looking for a mention of what "all just accounts" were being settled but found nothing.

Melissa speculated that Thomas Hickey may have been apprenticed to someone in whose name the account would have been, but her search in the records of apprenticeships of that time showed nothing about him. Nor does it seem likely that Samuel Hanmer, being a successful businessman and apparently an accurate bookkeeper would have omitted such a third party name from his statement of settlement.

Nonetheless, touching the paper and seeing the signature of possibly the convicted attempted kidnapper of our first President made me feel as if we had made substantial progress in our investigation.

Go to Next Chapter
Go to Thomas Hickey Table of Contents
Go to Wethersfield Historical Society Home Page

Chapter 4 - An Earlier Inquiry

Melissa continued looking though the society's files found a folder labeled "Thomas Hickey" in the archives of inquiries received by the organization. Inside was a typewritten letter dated May 9, 1958 and addressed to D.C. Willard, Esq., the organization's director at that time. It was sent by John Bakeless who was "just finishing a book on the espionage of the Revolutionary War and...making a final study of the plot of June 1776, either to kidnap, poison or stab George Washington..." That book became Traitors, Turncoats and Heroes, the one that Sol Henner had referred me to. It would arrive from the library a few days later.

Bakeless' letter continued, "The subsequent court-martial record and various other documents show that Sergeant Thomas Hickey, of the general's Life Guard was a ring-leader in this. They also show that he lived in Wethersfield for some time before 1775. "I am wondering: (a) whether you know of any local records that might list him, tax lists, lists of householders, or anything of the sort; (b) and also whether you can suggest where I might make any further inquiries."

The letter had been annotated "ans 6/19/58". There was no copy of a return letter but the word "over" inscribed at the bottom-right corner directed me to two columns of handwritten notes on the backside by what appeared to be the same author. Although more modern than the penmanship of Samuel Hanmer, the interpretation was equally difficult for me who I realized had been somewhat spoiled by having read (or written) little other than machine-printed lettering for probably the last two decades, if not longer.

The back page notes said such things as: "N.Y. City during the Am. Rev Mercantile Library Assoc. of NYC 1861, Proceeding of the Comm for the Hearing, June 22, 1776 Minutes of Gen Court martial which tried Thos Hickey etc."; and "Mayor of N.Y. David Matthews one of 13 Jail at Hartford moved in a week to Litchfield - (other 10 to Norwich)". But there is no mention of Thomas Hickey as a Wethersfield resident in any of the annotations.

While I was looking at the Bakeless inquiry, Melissa continued her search and found another Thomas Hickey folder. It had just one item - a 2/22/1967 article from what was then one of Hartford’s two daily newspapers - the Times. The author was William Keifer and bore the headline "Washington, Wethersfield and the Poisoned Peas."

"It is a known fact of history: George Washington stopped at Wethersfield. "An almost unknown fact of history is this: An infamous Wethersfield resident almost stopped Washington forever with a plate of peas. "The peas were poisoned and Thomas Hickey - listed in the old histories as a resident of Wethersfield almost succeeded in assassinating George Washington."
The article goes on to tell of Hickey's conviction and hanging "on charges of mutiny, sedition and 'treacherous correspondence with the enemies of the Colonies.'" And cites as a source Benson J. Lossing's History of the American Revolution (1906) which describes Hickey's crime as a "hellish plot" and a "foul conspiracy".

"The book also describes Hickey as a 'dark-complexioned Irishman', a deserter from the British Army 'several years before', and a resident of Wethersfield 'where he bore a good character and was selected (to be Washington's bodyguard) from the ranks of Knowlton's Connecticut Rangers. "Hickey’s signature can be found in one old Wethersfield storekeepers book, now in the Wethersfield Historical Society."

The remainder of the article tells of the attempt by Thomas Hickey, as a part of a conspiracy, to poison the General with the cooperation of Washington's housekeeper, the unnamed daughter of Samuel Fraunces, "proprietor of New York's historic Fraunces Tavern where Washington later bade farewell to his troops." Hickey managed to place the poison in the peas however the housekeeper told Washington of the plot. The General ordered that the lethally laced legumes be fed to some backyard hens, which subsequently were observed to become sick and die. Hickey and others were then arrested.

"But of all the conspirators only Thomas Hickey made his mark - however small in our national history."


(Washington's Farewell, Long Room,
Fraunces Tavern, December 4, 1783,
Henry Hintermeister, 1937
.)

Melissa's continuing search came up with no other references to Thomas Hickey in the WHS archives. So I ended that day's research with potentially a more complicated and more colorful plot against Washington but no firsthand evidence that the Thomas Hickey actually lived in our ancient town.

But there were also more sources to check out. In addition to the Bakeless book there was now also Lossing's History of the American Revolution mentioned in the Hartford Times article, and one other totally unexpected possibility. The Education Director for the Society Mary Pat Knowlton joined in our hunt and, when she saw the newspaper piece, left immediately to go home and check through her personal copy of Knowlton's Connecticut Ranger source material. It wasn't until I replayed that day's research activities in my mind that the eponymous relationship between the latest research team member and the subject matter of our latest search sank in.

Go to Next Chapter
Go to Thomas Hickey Table of Contents
Go to Wethersfield Historical Society Home Page

Chapter 5 - "Turncoats, Traitors and Heroes"



Meanwhile Turncoats, Traitors and Heroes arrived at the library. It has ten pages devoted to the story of Thomas Hickey, enough to make him eligible to be listed in the index. His story makes up the second half of a chapter entitled "Kidnapping George Washington". There is no mention of Wethersfield.

I checked the Notes at the back of the book. They are relatively extensive - twelve pertaining to the pages in question, several of that dozen identifying multiple sources. There are also five pages of acknowledgements, one with a subsection called "Connecticut spies". The word "Wethersfield" does not appear anywhere in either of these sections. I surmise, based upon the apparent thoroughness of Bakeless' research that he was not able to come up with anything definitive establishing Hickey's connection to our town and therefore did not include it in his book

The account of the attempted kidnapping is however more detailed than what I had found to date. And Bakeless also talks about the pea-poisoning episode.

"Kidnapping George Washington" begins with the story of Henry Dawkins, "a far from edifying character...[who] got out of jail in New York City in January or February, 1776... jail was the best possible place for that expert, but too enterprising, artist and engraver."

After his release, Dawkins went to Huntington, Long Island, "cheerfully thinking out a scheme whereby he could easily turn a dishonest shilling and a dishonest dollar at the same time."
He arrived at the home of brothers Israel and Isaac Young whom he convinced to help him to purchase a printing press -specifically a "rolling press", the kind used to print currency - and set it up on their property. The Young brothers allowed him to install the machine in their attic behind a concealed door.

"Counterfeiting in those days was not really very difficult. Lacking the innumerable protective devices of modern bank notes, the crude currency of the new American states was easily imitated. State and Continental 'shinplasters' were produced from ordinary engraved copper plates - perhaps at times from ordinary type; and counterfeiters only trouble was getting the right paper. Even the unsuspicious provincial treasuries of those days knew enough about currency to use a special kind - but alas for them – any printer could buy the same paper on the open market. To get some the Dawkins counterfeiting ring turned to one Isaac Ketcham. "...Ketcham visited Philadelphia, an early center for the American paper industry, examined paper and asked for prices....In ordinary times Ketcham's efforts to buy a little paper would have interested no one save some willing salesman. These times, however, were far from ordinary. Someone suspected a plot to counterfeit; and about May of 1776, Ketcham was arrested. To make matters worse, Dawkins got drunk about this time, made some rash remarks, and was likewise arrested. "Dawkins, Ketcham and the brothers Young, who presently joined them in jail, where themselves guilty of nothing worse than attempted counterfeiting...But in jail were others, still less innocent than the counterfeiting ring, engaged in dark affairs of state. They talked incautiously of other plots. Isaac Ketcham, hearing of graver matters, saw a chance to save himself."

There were two Tory plans: one to kidnap General Washington from his New York headquarters, and a second for a secret uprising of armed forces in New York City and on Long Island while the British Army led by General Howe and Admiral Lord Howe leading the Royal Navy attacked.

"Whether there was still a third plot, to stab or poison General Washington - as was firmly believed in New York at the time - is less certain..... There was no reason to stab or poison him if he could be kidnapped, for the British government very much wanted the archrebel alive, for trial and execution.... In the court-martial that followed [there was not] any mention of plans to poison or stab the general. "Dawkins and the Young brothers may never have learned anything about the Tory plots; but Ketcham, soon after he had been confined, got wind of the conspiracies, probably from gossip among the prisoners, perhaps from eavesdropping, perhaps in some other way.... Ketcham thought he saw a way out and, in early June of 1776, sent a petition to the Provincial Congress."

The basis of his plea was his need to care for his "six poor children" but he appended to it "Sir I the subscriber hath something to obsearve to the honourable house if I cold be admitted Its nothing concearning my one affair But intirely on another subgyt."

Apparently this footnote to his petition served its purpose, for written at the bottom of the document is "The application of Isaac Ketcham And the memorandum which finally ended in the execution of Thos Hickey for High Treason." Ketcham was offered a "purposual" that he return to prison as an American spy.

On June fifteenth Sergeant Thomas Hickey and Private Michael Lynch, both of Washington's Guard, were imprisoned for passing counterfeit money. Hickey met Ketcham and apparently bragged of being involved in both of the Tory plots. After two more days of collecting information Ketcham sent word to the Provincial Congress.

The New York authorities received confirmation of Ketcham's allegations when they arrested James Mason who had confided similar information to his former employer William Leary. He in turn notified the authorities. Mason implicated Hickey and others including New York Mayor David Matthews.

"As usual in wartime, the wildest rumors spread. It was reported that Hickey had instructions to stab General Washington. The story went around that he had poisoned a dish of green peas (of which Washington was specially fond); but that the general's housekeeper warned him time to send the peas away untasted. Someone, so the story ran, threw the peas into a chicken pen and all the chickens died."

Bakeless' footnote on this paragraph says: "Lossing in his Washington (I, 176) states that he had the facts from one W.J. Davis, who had them from Peter Embury, of New York, who knew Phoebe Fraunces. [the housekeeper] The story is repeated in Drowne...Freemman, IV, 121-n, believes the whole story a fabrication. The story was certainly widely accepted at the time."

Hickey was brought before a general court-martial convened personally by General Washington. According to Bakeless there is no evidence that any of the other "equally guilty accomplices" were ever tried or any reason given as to why. Three of the conspirators did however testify against Hickey.

The presiding officer was Colonel Samuel H. Parson. Hickey was charged with "exciting and joining in a mutiny and sedition, and of treacherously corresponding with, inlisting among, and receiving pay from the enemies of the United American Colonies." These charges were by themselves enough to hang any soldier. Bakeless offers the opinion that the Tory plots were never mentioned in order to keep from "putting bad ideas into people’s heads or causing uneasiness in the ranks."

Hickey pleaded not guilty. Four witnesses were called against him: William Green, Gilbert Forbes, William Welch, and Isaac Ketcham. Green attempted to convince the court that he and Hickey were involved in a self-concocted plot to detect the Tory's scheme into which Forbes tried to involve him. Forbes demurred that Green had instigated joining the scheme and that, at Hickey's request; he (Forbes) had paid Hickey half a dollar. Welch testified that Hickey tried to get him to join promising him "he would carry me to a man who would let me have a dollar by way of encouragement."

Hickey conducted his own defense. "He engaged in the scheme at first for the sake of cheating the Tories, and getting some money from them, and afterwards consented to have his name sent on board the man-of-war [from which the plots were being coordinated], in order that if the enemy should arrive and defeat the army here, and he should be taken prisoner, he might be safe."

The verdict was unanimous: "that the prisoner Thomas Hickey suffer death for said crimes by being hanged by the neck till he is dead." Execution was set for eleven o'clock the following morning, June 28th, 1776.

Four brigades (those of Generals Heath, Scott, Spencer and Lord Stirling) were ordered to watch the hanging. Twenty men from each brigade were assigned to guard the prisoner on his walk to the gallows. In all twenty thousand spectators were said to be present.

Hickey was accompanied by a chaplain to the scaffold and cried when the clergyman left him. But then "With an indignant scornful air he wiped 'em with his hand from his face and assumed the confident look." At the end he muttered threats against someone named Green "[unless he] was very cautious, the design would as yet be executed against him." Bakeless feels that Hickey was referring to William Green who testified against him. Then, blindfolded, he was hanged.

Washington’s orders for the day read in part: "The unhappy fate of Thomas Hickey, executed this day for mutiny, sedition and treachery, the General hopes will be a warning to every soldier in the Army to avoid those crimes and all others, so disgraceful to the character of a soldier, and pernicious to his country, whose pay he receives and bread he eats."

While Wethersfield is never mentioned, there was one Connecticut connection according to Bakeless. Henry Dawkins, the counterfeiter whose actions instigated this chain of events, was back in jail again - in Simsbury, Connecticut.

Go to Next Chapter
Go to Thomas Hickey Table of Contents
Go to Wethersfield Historical Society Home Page